Eagerly anticipated horror’s producer explains why ‘0.0 percent watchable’ film flopped – Bundlezy

Eagerly anticipated horror’s producer explains why ‘0.0 percent watchable’ film flopped

M3GAN in M3GAN 2.0
M3GAN 2.0 has failed to make waves compared to its predecessor (Picture: Universal Studios/Geoffrey Short. All Rights Reserved)

Following the success of M3GAN in 2022, it seems like the horror film’s sequel was guaranteed to be a big hit.

But it so M3GAN 2.0 far holds a rotten 57% rating from critics on Rotten Tomatoes and has failed to score big at the box office.

Directed by Gerard Johnstone, the sequel follows the events of the first film, picking up two years later as Gemma (Allison Williams) has become an advocate for government oversight of AI.

She is forced to resurrect her murderous creation after a defence contractor creates a military-grade weapon known as Amelia, whose self-awareness increases to deadly levels, forcing M3GAN to bring her down.

Violet McGraw, Amie Donald, Jenna Davis, Brian Jordan Alvarez, and Jen Van Epps all reprised their roles from the prior film, while Ivanna Sakhno, Timm Sharp, Aristotle Athari and Jemaine Clement joined the cast.

After being slammed by critics as ‘a downgrade’ and ‘thoroughly middling’, producer Jason Blum has shared why he believed the sequel did not connect with fans.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

Up Next

Universal Pictures and Blumhouse present the M3GAN 2.0 premiere
Producer Jason Blum has shared why he thinks (Picture: Kevin Mazur/Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Universal Pictures, Blumhouse and Atomic Monster)

‘We all thought M3GAN was like Superman,’ he told The Town podcast. ‘We could do anything to her. We could change genres. We could put her in the summer. We could make her look different. We could turn her from a bad guy into a good guy.

‘And we classically overthought how powerful people’s engagement was, really, with her.’

He also cited the film’s genre shift, from a bloody horror to more of an action-comedy, as another factor, as well as the film’s summer release.

‘We thought she could live in the summer, right? We thought, “We’re going from a little movie to a tentpole!”‘

In their review, The New Yorker wrote: ‘M3GAN 2.0 has little dramatic shape and no directorial style. In striving for more than the original, it achieves far less.’

M3GAN 2.0 sees the murderous android brought back from the dead to face off against another AI creation (Picture: Universal Pictures/REX/Shutterstock)
Several cast members reprised their roles, including lead star Allison Williams (Picture: Universal Pictures/REX/Shutterstock)

Rolling Stone added: ‘Her model is 2.0. The overbaked, underwhelming, narratively restless movie itself is 0.0 percent watchable.’

The Hollywood Reporter said: ‘A convoluted mishmash with shades of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Mission: Impossible and the Austin Powers franchise. There are amusing moments reminiscent of the original, but in terms of tone and coherence, the movie loses its way.’

However, others said that the film is ‘a blast’ and ‘a campy delight.’

MovieFreak.com reasoned: ‘[M3GAN 2.0] is proof that bigger isn’t always better. But that doesn’t mean this goofy, far too convoluted sequel still can’t be a gigantic amount of fun.’

M3GAN 2.0 is in cinemas now

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

About admin