Britain recognising Palestinian statehood must be more than a gesture

Keir Starmer has officially recognised the State of Palestine.

Writing that sentence still feels almost surreal.

For over a century, Britain has been central to the Palestinian story — not as a neutral actor, but as the former colonial power that first promised away a land that was not theirs to give. Recognition now, after decades of denial, is a historic shift.

As a Palestinian who grew up in Gaza and now lives in the UK, my reaction is mixed: a measure of relief that this day has come and frustration that it took so long, arriving only after so much has been destroyed.

The roots of this decision stretch back to Britain’s Balfour Declaration of 1917, which promised a ‘national home for the Jewish people’ in Palestine. Even though the declaration originally called for the protection of the existing population, under the British Mandate, Palestinians were treated as obstacles to be managed, not as a people with national rights.

That history casts a long shadow. For Palestinians, Britain has never been a bystander; it has been an architect of our dispossession.

To have Britain now say the word ‘Palestine’ with recognition is significant precisely because of its earlier role in denying us.

When the idea was first floated in July this year, it sounded like another conditional gesture — one more delay in a century of them. Successive governments have spoken of recognising Palestine ‘when the time is right’, but that time never came.

The suggestion that recognition would come only if Israel acted a certain way was another way of holding Palestinian rights hostage. That is why this moment matters: Britain has finally taken a step it has avoided for generations.

Legally, recognition affirms Palestinians’ right to statehood under international law. 

Diplomatically, it allows Palestine to strengthen its standing in international institutions, from the United Nations to the International Criminal Court. 

Symbolically, it places Palestine on equal footing with Israel in the eyes of the UK — no longer a disputed question, but a recognised reality. And politically, recognition by a permanent member of the UN Security Council gives weight that smaller states alone cannot.

But recognition also has sharp limitations. It does not end Israel’s bombardment of Gaza. It does not reverse decades of settlement expansion in the West Bank. And it does not, on its own, force Israel to comply with international law.

This is the uncomfortable truth: recognition is necessary, but not sufficient. Words on paper do not stop bombs from falling.

This is why Britain cannot treat recognition as the end of its responsibility. If it is serious, recognition must be followed by material action.

Follow Metro on WhatsApp to be the first to get all the latest news

Metro’s on Whatsapp! Join our community for breaking news and juicy stories.

That means halting arms sales to Israel, which fuels the violence. It means pressing for accountability at the International Criminal Court for war crimes and crimes against humanity. It means backing reconstruction in Gaza and ending the diplomatic cover that has allowed Israeli impunity for so long.

Without these steps, recognition risks being reduced to a symbolic gesture — a headline without consequence.

There is also a broader strategic significance. By recognising Palestine, the UK joins European states such as Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia that have already taken this step. Britain’s position as a permanent member of the Security Council magnifies the impact, potentially encouraging other Western countries to follow.

Recognition isolates those governments, like the United States, that continue to deny Palestinian statehood even in the face of overwhelming evidence of a people’s right to exist. In this sense, Britain’s decision could help shift the international balance — not enough to change everything, but enough to begin reshaping the conversation.

For Palestinians living in Britain, recognition is also a shift in how this country relates to us: no longer forcing us to defend our very existence, but acknowledging it.

It is important, too, to underline what recognition is not. It is not a gift Britain is bestowing on Palestinians, nor a favour. It is an overdue admission of a truth that Palestinians have asserted for generations: that we are a people with the right to a state of our own.

Every delay in recognition has been another form of denial, another way of suggesting our rights were contingent on negotiations or behaviour or timing. By recognising Palestine now, Britain is finally conceding what should never have been in question.

So what does this mean for the future? At best, it creates the political space for serious accountability and renewed pressure for a just settlement. At worst, it becomes a symbolic milestone that politicians cite while continuing with business as usual.

The choice lies with Britain itself. Recognition can be the beginning of a new approach — one rooted in justice and accountability — or it can be a convenient gesture that papers over ongoing complicity.

For Palestinians, the recognition is historic, but the measure of its importance will be judged not in words, but in whether it helps change the reality on the ground.

The bombs still fall. The occupation continues. The challenge now is to ensure that recognition is not the end of Britain’s responsibility, but the start of fulfilling it.

Do you have a story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing James.Besanvalle@metro.co.uk. 

Share your views in the comments below.