admin – Page 481 – Bundlezy

admin

Did privacy-loving Meghan Markle release excruciating labour video to battle bizarre fake bump & surrogate rumours?

IT’S rare that I drop into the foetal position and reach for the Pepto-Bismol BEFORE my night out. 

But that’s what I found myself doing as Meghan Markle dropped her vomit-inducing YouTwerk video just when I was heading to the pub on Wednesday night. 

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room.
Meghan Harry, pictured doing their ‘vomit-inducing’ YouTwerk video
Instagram
Black and white photo of a woman hugging a child on a boat.
Instagram/Meghan
Meghan shares a shot with Lilibet to mark her fourth birthday[/caption]
Time magazine cover featuring Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Reuters
Let’s not forget that Time Magazine cover, above, where Harry sat on a wall and peered over Meghan’s shoulder, behind her power stance.[/caption]

Her and husband Prince Harry’s cringey performance of the Baby Momma Dance, in a private hospital room shortly before she gave birth to the couple’s second child Lilibet, left me gagging over a bin full of copies of his memoir Spare. 

We’ve now had to endure years of the bizarre, “Don’t look at me . . .  Why aren’t you looking at me?!” demands of M&H. 

Their hypocrisy is dizzying and leaves many of us searching for a reason to explain their constant desire for on-their-terms attention. 

Not least the conspiracy theorists now using the twerking episode — shared by Meghan on her Instagram to mark Lilibet’s fourth birthday — as reason to speculate that she was, in fact, never even pregnant. 

Long has there been a notion that M&H were lying about their second pregnancy — and the throwback clip throws fuel on the fire. 

Twitter critics are shouting that Meghan is wearing a fake “moon-bump” and there is no woman at full-term pregnancy who could grind with such vigour.

They claim she must be “superhuman” and that the video isn’t even in a hospital room. 

Ultrasound image 

Several claim, without credible evidence, her bump is too high or the wrong shape to be real. 

Some spin groundless claims the video was faked, made on a film set or AI-generated — and say that if she had been about to give birth in hospital, she would have been in a gown and had jewellery removed. 

Meanwhile a recent mood board of pictures on her Instagram showed a bare-bellied Meghan heavily preg-nant with first child Archie.

She even posted an ultrasound image of her unborn son — but many claimed it was all just a way to prove she was pregnant. 

The daftest claims are that she has hired the kids to help her sell items from her various companies. 

This is not the first time the Duchess of Sussex has faced false claims of faked pregnancy — with keyboard warriors claiming she hired a surrogate, wore dodgy, mis-fitting bumps and refused to announce the birth when it happened.

Like baddies in a Disney film, they seem regenerated when being talked about. Unless we say things that they don’t like, of course.

None of which has any clout, of course. 

But it does strike many as strange that the couple who constantly bang on about privacy and safety would release a video of one of the most intimate days of their life together for no reason other than attention. 

I, like the many self-respecting residents of this fine nation, can’t fathom why the married couple would a) make the video and b) having watched how excruciating it is, put it out to the world four years later.

But then, we’re not Meghan and Harry. Like baddies in a Disney film, they seem regenerated when being talked about. Unless we say things that they don’t like, of course. 

We’ve now had to endure years of the bizarre “Don’t look at me . . .  Why aren’t you looking at me?!” demands of M&H. Their hypocrisy is dizzying and leaves many of us trying to find a more complicated reason for their constant desire for on-their-terms attention. 

Meghan has a tree-falling-in-woods attitude to life: if no one is watching her, did it even happen? 

Prince Harry juggling in a video cameo.
Archewell
Harry was seen, through a window, juggling like a chained-up garden jester while Meg and actress Melissa McCarthy celebrated her 40th birthday[/caption]
Woman in black dress by hospital bed.
The Duchess showing off her moves

She is an actress, after all. For decades she’s dreamed of red carpets, standing ovations and gold statuettes in her hand. 

She needs eyes on her, whatever Netflix series she’s doing — whether it’s as a tradwife in the recent With Love, Meghan, moaning about the Royals in Harry & Meghan or not being watched by anyone in Polo. 

Watching Harry dancing in the video, it’s impossible to decipher the exact moment his last drop of dignity left his body for ever.

After hitting “play” on the camera, he frantically zig-zags across the screen — pointing, stomping and crab-shuffling across the room. 

Surely, if we could see his eyes, they must have shown his suffering? Those windows to the souls must have been crying for help. 

Harry … has long been allowed only the odd walk-on part in The Meghan Show.

Perhaps I’m giving the pampered prince far too much credit — he’s my fellow fortysomething and no one of us should be capable of such toe-curling antics unless under duress. 

I’m speaking as someone who suddenly finds the night bus timetable fascinating if the word karaoke is even uttered on a night out. 

He gyrates as only the true British upper class learns how, at their first rugby club ball.

All he needs is some champagne poured from the bottle into his mouth by a bloke called Hugo and it would be like he’s back his old London nightclub haunt Boujis, in South Kensington. 

Harry, who has spent thousands suing the Home Office and claiming his family aren’t safe on British soil, has long been allowed only the odd walk-on part in The Meghan Show.

Remember how he pointed out chickens to Oprah Winfrey while Meghan did the grown-up chat, giving the world headlines about the horrid Royals? 

Or when he was seen, through a window, juggling like a chained-up garden jester while Meg and actress Melissa McCarthy celebrated her 40th birthday.

And let’s not forget that Time Magazine cover where he sat on a wall and peered over her shoulder, behind her power stance. 

His bit-part in this sad excuse for delivery-room bantz shines through — as does the lack of laughter or chemistry between the pair. 

He may also soon have competition in his understudy status, as on Wednesday Meghan expressed her dream of launching a future with Lilibet.

Chatting to Beyonce’s mother Tina Knowles on her podcast, she shared: “I wonder if one day I’ll be in business with Lili and we’ll be building something.” 

Better keeeeep dancing, Harry. 

Person in a hoodie squatting in a hospital room.
Prince Harry joined in and dropped it down low
Woman in black dress by hospital bed.
The Duchess showed off her moves

Read More »

What’s really behind Chris Martin & Dakota Johnson’s split after 8 years as actress feels ‘incredible pain’ at break-up

LOVE-SPLIT stars Chris ­Martin and Dakota Johnson were on the rocks for ten months as cracks began to appear on their picture- perfect facade.

But while reps for the Coldplay frontman and Fifty Shades Of Grey actress Dakota insisted they were “happily together”, in ­reality their eight-year romance was falling apart.

Dakota Johnson at the Kering Women in Motion Awards.
Getty
Dakota Johnson and Chris ­Martin have split after eight years together[/caption]
Chris Martin at the Invictus Games opening ceremony.
Alamy
Chris’ relationship with Dakota had been on the rocks for 10 months before their split[/caption]
Chris Martin and Dakota Johnson holding hands while walking.
BackGrid
The couple holding hands in Mumbai in January[/caption]

The pair, who got engaged in 2020 but kept it under wraps for years, have now broken up for what is understood to be the final time, with those close to them saying it is Dakota left licking her wounds.

A well-placed source revealed: “Dakota wanted this relationship to work.

“She not only loves Chris, but his two kids, and that loss feels incredibly painful.

“The decision to end things was amicable, but Dakota is finding it hard.

“Over the past year, it became clear that their relationship had stalled and wasn’t moving forwards.

Having children together didn’t seem to be on the cards, and their careers have been pulling them in different directions.

“Chris has been on tour for three years, his schedule is insane.

“Settling down, as in Chris properly taking his foot off the pedal, isn’t going to happen.

“And, ultimately, it was one of the many straws that broke the back of them.”

It is not the first time Chris, 48, and Dakota, 35, have ended things.

In 2019, just over a year after they started dating, they split after it was alleged she had brought up wanting kids — a ship that insiders said had sailed for Chris, who already has Apple, 21, and Moses, 19, with actress Gwyneth Paltrow.

They quickly reunited and an engagement soon followed, with a huge emerald ring that was reported to have cost Chris £300,000.

Dakota moved in to Chris’s Malibu home and went on to become a familiar face at gatherings with Gwyneth, who says her ex-husband is now like a brother to her.

In fact, Gwyn — who married Chris in 2003 but announced in 2014 that she was “consciously uncoupling” from the music star — gave the ­couple her seal of approval.

She said of Dakota in 2020: “I love her. I can see how it would seem weird because it’s sort of unconventional.

“But I think, in this case, just having passed through it iteratively, I just adore her.”

It was finally confirmed Chris and Dakota were engaged last year, but the wedding never happened.

By summer, their relationship was said to have been close to breaking point again.

Dakota Johnson and Chris Martin on a balcony.
The Mega Agency
Chris and Dakota at the beginning of their relationship in 2018[/caption]

“This break-up has been on the cards for almost a year,” our source explained.

“Chris and Dakota have had issues in their relationship, but they have always managed to work through them.

“They approached it like a team and were supportive of each other’s careers.

“Dakota even directed Coldplay’s video for Cry Cry Cry in 2020.

“They were great cheerleaders for each other.

“But after he went on tour in 2022, things became more complicated.

“Earlier this year, they had more time to talk because Chris’s schedule calmed down and it became clear they were in a rut and they weren’t moving forwards.

“Dakota is holding out that there is hope for them in the future but, for now, they aren’t together and are trying to move forwards.”

‘WILD RIDE’

Insiders claim Coldplay’s intense Music Of The Spheres world tour unquestionably played a part in Chris’s latest split from Dakota.

The mammoth, 225-date run of shows started in March 2022, when she was filming superhero blockbuster Madame Web, in which she played the leading lady.

The band’s trek, which will see Chris back on stage tonight in Clark County, Nevada, features performances across 43 countries — with the final leg booked for London in August and September, where Coldplay will hold a ten-night ­residency at Wembley Stadium.

“Chris and Dakota weren’t often on the same time zones, but they made it work,” our source explained.

“But eight years is a long time to be together and not actually be able to properly settle down.

“When they first got together, Chris and Dakota had a semi-normal life.

“They spent time together and did things that normal couples do, like hanging out on the beach and going on long walks.

“But Chris is not the kind of man who can sit down and twiddle his thumbs.

Gwyneth Paltrow and Dakota Johnson at the Gucci Love Parade.
Getty
Dakota is good friends with Chris’ ex-wife Gwyneth Paltrow[/caption]
Gwyneth Paltrow, Brad Falchuk, Chris Martin, and Dakota Johnson on a beach.
Goff Photos
Chris, Dakota and Gwyneth have been pictured spending time together[/caption]

“Coldplay’s ninth album, Music Of The Spheres, came out in 2021 and they started the tour a year later.

“On the road, they dropped the album Moon Music last year, too. It’s been a wild ride.

“Chris is a born performer and this work, alongside other endeavours, is what he’ll do for decades to come.

“There was no wedding because when was there going to be time?

“Dakota’s schedule is far less intense, but just a glance at Chris’s is enough to make your eyes cross.”

Those close to the couple said talk of starting a family was also always in the background of their relationship.

Our insider explained: “Dakota is an amazing stepmother to Chris’s children and she adored them.

“Family is very important to both her and Chris, and Dakota loved nothing more than being around them.

“But Chris is older, he’s got children already.”

Last year, Dakota made her feelings clear when asked about motherhood during a candid interview.

We’re not here for very long, so if I’m meant to be a mother, bring it on

Dakota Johnson

She said: “I’m so open to that.

“I’ve gotten to this place where I really want to experience everything life has to offer.

“And, especially being a woman, I’m like, ‘What a magical f***ing thing to do. What a crazy, magical, wild experience’.

“If that’s meant to happen for me, I’m totally down for it.

“We’re not here for very long, so if I’m meant to be a mother, bring it on.”

Of Chris’s children, Apple and Moses, she added: “I love those kids like my life depends on it. With all my heart.”

Dakota was seen for the first time after the news of their split in New York this week.

She had taken off the emerald engagement ring Chris proposed with and kept a low profile as she headed for lunch with friends.

Chris, meanwhile, will play another night in Clark County tomorrow, before shows in Colorado, Texas and Massachusetts.

Dakota Johnson in a scene from Fifty Shades Freed.
Alamy
Dakota in a scene from Fifty Shades Freed[/caption]
Dakota Johnson as Cassandra Webb in *Madame Web*.
PA
Dakota as the lead in Madame Web[/caption]

Our source said: “It’s business as usual for Chris and Dakota right now, because there’s nothing else they can do.

“Break-ups are never easy and this one isn’t any ­different.

“But they haven’t been together for some time, so there has been a chance for Dakota and Chris to navigate this without it being public knowledge.

“The hardest part for Dakota will be losing not only Chris, but the extended family in Apple and Moses, who she doted on.

“They will undoubtedly stay in touch as they’re older — they’re not kids any more.

“But it won’t be the same and naturally they will grow apart as people so often do.

“It’s going to be a difficult road for her to navigate, but there is nothing but love between them.

“Sadly it just wasn’t going to be the happily ever after Dakota wanted.”

Chris Martin performing at the Invictus Games opening ceremony.
Getty
Chris is travelling the world with Coldplay[/caption]

Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme – Sun Club.

Read More »

How sick killer murdered wife, told kids she’d walked out then convinced son to dig her up in evil plot to evade justice

ANDREW Griggs had been expecting the knock on the door for more than 20 years. 

When it finally came, he showed no surprise as detectives arrested him for the 1999 murder of his wife Debbie, 34. 

Andrew Griggs in handcuffs.
Wife killer Andrew Griggs, after being arrested by cops
PA
Photo of Debbie Griggs on her 21st birthday, cutting a cake.
SWNS:South West News Service
Tragic Debbie Griggs pictured on her 21st birthday[/caption]
Bride and groom on their wedding day.
supplied
Griggs was married to Debbie for nine years before murdering her[/caption]

By then, the former fisherman had a new life and wife in another part of the country with the three sons he fathered with Debbie. 

The former nurse was pregnant with a fourth boy when Griggs murdered her at their home in Deal, Kent, as sons Jeremy, then six, Jake, four, and 18-month-old Luke slept upstairs. 

Griggs later brainwashed the boys into believing their mother had deserted them and ran off. 

But Debbie was, in fact, just a few feet away. 

Hours after killing her, Griggs put her body in a plastic water butt which he sealed with fibreglass. 

He hid the body in the drum for two years in his parents’ back garden. 

When the Griggs family moved from Kent to Dorset in 2001, he took Debbie’s body with him inside the water butt. 

He buried her under a concrete shed base beneath a lean-to at the side of their house in the village of St Leonards, near Bournemouth

And for years she remained there as Griggs played happy families with his sons and second wife — also named Debbie — who he met in 2005. 

The appalling secret emerged after Griggs was convicted of Debbie’s murder in October 2019 and jailed for life with a 20-year minimum tariff. 

Days after his conviction, Griggs concocted a plan to clear his name. 

‘He manipulates people around him’ 

He tried to enlist the unwitting help of middle son Jake, now 25, to unearth his mother’s remains. 

During a prison visit, he asked Jake to cut off a lock of her hair, travel to France and post it to UK authorities with a note purporting to be from Debbie saying she was alive and wanted to be left alone. 

He lied to Jake that he had found Debbie’s body in their old back garden and feared his late father — Jake’s paternal grandfather — had murdered her. 

Jake deprived his own grandad of the opportunity to bury his daughter and then took money from his will, all the while knowing where his mum was.

Debbie’s brother Wayne Cameron

Griggs also told his son he created the subterfuge about Debbie leaving them as he feared being framed for her murder. 

For almost three years, Jake kept his father’s twisted request a secret before he blurted it out to his girlfriend during a row. 

Jake and his girlfriend consulted his stepmother and the trio went to the local police to report it. 

In the meantime, Debbie’s father Brian Cameron passed away in 2021, two years after wife Patricia died “from a broken heart” without seeing justice for their daughter. 

Griggs, now 68, was branded a conniving narcissist by a judge this week as he was given a further three years for perverting the course of justice. 

Debbie’s brother Wayne Cameron, 57, said his family believe his nephew Jake should have been in the dock with Griggs. 

Wayne told The Sun: “Jake deprived his own grandad of the opportunity to bury his daughter and then took money from his will, all the while knowing where his mum was. 

“No one can understand why he did not come forward sooner.” 

He added: “As a family, we believe charges need to be brought against Jake.

“In some ways I feel for him. 

“He was just a four-year-old boy when this happened, but he’s an adult now and he should know better.” 

Perhaps in a subconscious state of denial, Jake continued to refuse to accept his father’s guilt even after Griggs owned up to burying his mum at their house. 

After their father’s conviction, Jake and his brothers had launched a misguided “Find Our Mum” Facebook appeal to prove Debbie was still alive.

To this day, Griggs’ family continue to support him, with second wife Debbie saying: “I know him and I know he could not have done what they said he did.” 

DCI Neil Kimber, of the Kent Police cold case review team, describes Griggs as a “very brash and forceful character.” 

The detective adds: “He has charisma and charm and manipulates people around him.” 

Griggs was married to Debbie for nine years before murdering her. 

He cheated on her with a 15-year-old girl and extracts from Debbie’s diary reveal she was suspicious about the relationship. 

Debbie also wrote of the control Griggs exerted, saying: “He does not let me go out by myself.”

In March 1999, after Debbie became pregnant with their fourth child, Griggs walked out on her and their children. 

Police officers searching for clues.
SWNS:South West News Service
Police searching for clues in Deal, Kent, after Debbie’s disappearance[/caption]
White Peugeot car found abandoned.
Refer to agency
Debbie’s abandoned Peugeot[/caption]

Debbie — who had suffered from post-natal depression after her first two children — worked for the Griggs family frozen fish business

Griggs was sole beneficiary of the firm and consulted a solicitor on the financial implications if he divorced. 

He was told Debbie would be entitled to half the business and house which prompted him to go back to his family. 

On 4 May that year Griggs transferred the funds from their joint business account into his own name. 

At 6pm the next day, Debbie picked up her sons from a children’s party. 

The last proof of her being alive came at 7.38am when she spoke to a friend, Lisa Vickers, and made arrangements to see her the next day. 

Detectives believe that by 11.20pm that night Griggs had murdered Debbie, as that was the time he rang a work colleague to say he was unable to go to Billingsgate the next day. 

A neighbour reported Debbie’s white Peugeot 309 car being driven away from the Griggs’ house at 2am. 

Then at 5.30am Griggs called his father and business partner Jonathan to inform him he would not be working that day as Debbie had left him and the children

He repeated the story to relatives and friends that day, including Debbie’s mother who he visited at 5pm. 

At 9.20pm Griggs spoke to a friend of Debbie’s who asked if he had called police, prompting him to finally report her missing. 

Confusing her age, Griggs told the 999 operator his wife was “34 . . . 35,” and added: “She is suffering from depression — postnatal depression.

“We’ve got three little boys and she’s just wound up too much.” 

Debbie’s car was found in Deal a week after her disappearance.

The boot carpet liner had been removed and there were traces of her blood. 

‘We’ve spent 20 years in a state of disbelief’ 

Rumours reached police about Griggs’ affair with the teenage girl, and on 25 May he was arrested on suspicion of murder. 

He was quizzed 11 times, denied the affair and insisted Debbie had walked out on him, calling her “selfish.” 

But the CPS ruled there was insufficient evidence to charge Griggs. 

A month following Debbie’s disappearance, Griggs had put the family home on sale and begun inquiring about properties in Bournemouth.

After moving to Dorset he began a relationship with another woman, coincidentally also called Debbie, before splitting from her and meeting current wife, Debbie Three. 

Sometimes when you arrest people in the early hours they get quite upset, but it was like he was expecting a knock on the door one day.

Arresting detective Alan Davie

Kent Police continued to investigate Debbie’s disappearance and in 2001 they were contacted by the new owners of the Griggs’ fish business. 

They had found a love letter sent to Griggs by the 15-year-old girl he had an affair with. 

Griggs was re-arrested but continued to deny the affair — claiming the girl was a fantasist. 

Again, prosecutors ruled there was insufficient evidence to charge Griggs. 

In 2007, his marriage to Debbie was formally dissolved by presumption of death, leaving him free to remarry. 

Debbie’s family continued to fight for justice and police asked the CPS to review the evidence in 2018.

Despite the absence of Debbie’s body, senior prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC authorised a charge of murder against Griggs

Griggs was arrested at dawn on 12 March 2019.

Arresting detective Alan Davie said: “It was interesting because he wasn’t surprised. 

“Sometimes when you arrest people in the early hours they get quite upset, but it was like he was expecting a knock on the door one day.” 

Griggs’ 15-year-old lover, now in her 30s, gave evidence at his Canterbury crown court trial about how she had been groomed by him. 

The financial motive was also established and jurors heard how a few weeks before Debbie vanished he told a friend he wished she was dead. 

He was convicted of murder, leaving Debbie’s family relieved but still in anguish over her whereabouts.

Jailing Griggs, Mr Justice Spencer suggested the experienced sailor had buried Debbie’s body at sea. 

The truth finally emerged as Griggs played his last hand by trying to dupe his own son. 

Debbie’s body was found on 5 October 2022, twisted into a Z-shape inside the water butt which had been wrapped in blue tarpaulin. 

She was bound in duvet covers with straps which were found to match photos of ties Griggs previously used to prop up a canoe.

Debbie’s clothing, jewellery and the missing boot carpet liner were also found. 

A post-mortem was unable to establish her cause of death but DCI Kimber said: “There were no broken bones or blunt force injuries. 

“We strongly suspect he strangled or suffocated Debbie.”

Debbie’s sister Wendie Rowlinson said she was at her home in New Zealand when she learned she had been found. 

Referring to her sister and Debbie’s unborn child, Wendie said: “Griggs hid their bodies from us so that we couldn’t bury them, couldn’t grieve. 

“We spent 20 years not knowing whether Debbie was dead or alive, in a state of disbelief, the not knowing a constant torture.” 

Griggs is not due to be released until 2041 at the earliest — if he lives that long. 

A charge of obstructing the coroner — punishable with a maximum of life imprisonment — was left on file. 

Debbie’s family are considering appealing the length of the sentence. 

Her brother Wayne said: “We spent longer looking for photos to help the police’s case than he got for hiding Debbie’s body.” 

Buried container of human remains.
PA
Debbie’s body was found on 5 October 2022, twisted into a Z-shape inside the water butt which had been wrapped in blue tarpaulin[/caption]
Crime scene photo: burial site of human remains.
PA
The water butt with Debbie’s body was buried here – just yards from where Griggs was raising their children[/caption]

Read More »