Confirmed. The PP still does not know how to successfully confront Pedro Sanchez in face to face.
I do not rule out that the endeavor is impossible. I have already written a thousand times that it is impossible to defeat an amoral man by hand. because your main weapon is your own morality. Defeating an amoral requires, at a minimum, immorality. And, in many cases, an amorality equivalent to theirs.
And not everyone is willing to cross that line.
The PP, clearly, does not want to cross it and aspires to play in the realm of reason.
And maybe it will do well, although the truth is that I don’t know. Could be. It is a debate between Machiavelli y Kant.
In any case. Politically, the recipe to confront Sánchez is obvious and is called Isabel Diaz Ayuso. The only person on the face of the Earth who has the morals of the President of the Government for reasons that have more to do with psychology than politics.
But live and direct, Pedro Sánchez continues to be an impregnable fortress for the PP of Genoa.
The President of the Government, Pedro Sánchez, this Thursday at the ‘Koldo commission’ in the Senate.
Only once did Sánchez seem to falter. It was in the face to face debate against Alberto Núñez Feijóo on July 10, 2023, two weeks before the general elections on the 23rd of that same month.
Feijóo did so well in that face-to-face, in fact, that his advisors recommended that he go into hiding during the second week of the campaign and thus lose all the advantage gained during that debate.
The outcome is known. The PP derailed approximately twenty seats in just seven days and allowed Sánchez to save the match ball electoral.
Because even when he loses, Sánchez is capable of dynamiting the morale of the PP and force them to act like the eternal title contender who never manages to overcome his own fear of victory. Something that, on the other hand, is not so strange when not even you trust your own ideas. If the PP could plagiarize the PSOE program, everything would be easier for them! Who had the PSOE voters!
So my confusion today in front of the overacted third degree to Pedro Sánchez of Alejo Miranda de Larra It grew second by second while I tried to find out what the PP’s strategy was in that investigation commission.
Make the president nervous and make him swear?
Fix a story whose content is truism?
A five-second cut with the possibility of going viral on social networks?
Trying to cause a tsunami of verbiage to make Sánchez take a wrong step and inadvertently reveal that Begoña Has he taken money from Venezuelan drug trafficking hand over fist?
Figure out something?
I said it Marta Espartero in X.”The cartoonish tone of Alejo Miranda, who pretends to be Randall from The Patio Bandwhich descends into the mud, which seeks to make people nervous and establish a framework, the only thing it does is cause embarrassment. He won’t even respond, and the only thing that shines is the institutional discredit. Tremendous”.
And then he added: “If it is unbearable and generates a brutal rejection for coffee-loving people (like me), what won’t it do for ordinary people? It would make me very happy to be a PP voter and see this guy (or a Rocío Divaroa Ana Beltranthere behind) to believe that they are in their moment of glory.
Tweets by Marta Espartero about the interrogation of Pedro Sánchez in the Senate.
Although day-to-day life in a real court is usually very far from the dramatized interrogations of American films, even in them one can sense a way of working more refined than today’s third degree to Sánchez in the Senate. A way of working that plays with the times and that he lets the accused talk when he can screw up and machine-guns him when he tries to slip away.
Even sheepdogs know how to crouch or show their teeth depending on the behavior of the sheep. I say it won’t be that difficult. A sheepdog is smart. But less than a Spanish deputy.
As it says Arturo Criado In his video for EL ESPAÑOL, going out onto the field ready to crush the opponent’s ankles usually leads to a red card in the first minute of play.
It has also not been clear to me (assuming that a commission of inquiry in the Senate serves absolutely no useful purpose) what the direction of the PP’s interrogation was and where it wanted to go with its questions. Sánchez was asked today about Ferraz’s envelopes, about his brother, about Aldamaby Delcyfor his father-in-law and for abalos, Koldo y Cerdan.
But without threading the questions in such a way as to convey the idea that the common link to all these cases is, precisely, Pedro Sánchez.
Rather, the idea of a bombardment with cluster bombs that have fallen everywhere except on the president’s head has been conveyed.
One should understand the framework in which he plays. In a trial, above the lying accused there is a judge, theoretically impartial, who has the power to discipline the prisoner with a punishment. In a commission of inquiry, and even though the theory says that a lie in it is a crime, there is no similar authority. The president of the commission is, at best, a moderator.
But little more than that.
And in front of that enormous, gigantic exit door, a defendant who does not want to answer will not answer anything, so the entire interrogation will remain in the realm of theater. Of pure theater.
All this does not serve in any case to exonerate Sánchez. The PP’s clumsiness does not turn Sánchez into a tactical genius. Sánchez dominates the staging, yes, but it is advisable not to confuse his amorality with intelligence or even cleverness..
The investigative commissions will not, of course, be the scenarios in which we see Sánchez collapse.
But as I said Cruyff“I don’t ask a goalkeeper to stop goals that are impossible to stop, I only ask him not to score goals that can be stopped into his own goal.”
The president must be reproached for “I don’t know.” The PP has not yet found the tone, seven years later.
The post Never has a third degree been as unproductive as that of the PP today against Sánchez appeared first on Veritas News.
